in my November column in the Sydney Observer (Nov 2026, p.31)
(https://sydneyobserver.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/Observer-November-2026_20261028_100349_0000.pdf), I argue for a more cautious approach to AI and digital detox focusing on two main concerns:
Education: Excessive screen time is linked to poor learning outcomes The 2026 Australian NAPLAN results showed that 1 in 3 students in years 3-9 failed to meet proficiency standards in reading, writing, numeracy and spelling due to excessive digital time. American and Australian schools are now implementing “digital detox programs”—reducing screen time, promoting offline experiences and traditional school teaching methods—using phonics, explicit instruction and pen and paper for writing. Silicon valley parents want digital devices and screentime out of their kids’ classrooms.
Mental health: Globally, the use of AI for mental health is rising significantly.1 in 5 young Australians use AI for therapy (The West Australian, 2 June 2026). This high usage troubles me deeply. AI therapists prompted by algorithms cannot provide the personalised understanding and crisis intervention that human professionals offer. “Elizabeth”, a 13-year client presented with complex psychological issues. I was able to help her as I am familiar with her mental health and family history.
Advocates of AI therapy argue that AI is more accessible and cost-effective. These advocates fail to recognise one major limitation about using AI for therapy — what happens if the users express suicidal or grave negative thoughts as many seriously ill clients do. It is important for a therapist to know the client’s history and arrange timely real-world care.
I often had to do this. I had to admit a client who had a psychotic breakdown to emergency hospital with her psychiatrist. I also briefed the admitting doctor about her mental health history and medication. How could an AI therapist do that? And what happens to clients when they don’t get timely help?
AI is a technological tool and business product. There is no human behind it. We would not discuss our problems with a stranger or let our kids be taught by a machine. So why would we admit AI into our lives unquestioningly. I urge parents, schools, professionals, and governments to address AI’s potential effects on learning, emotional development, and mental health urgently rather than adopting it uncritically.
